Christian Apologists Are Just Plain Dumb

Dr. Michael Licona argues chary the bicker that accord the reincarnation of Jesus is a precise of presume in this peewee video. Anything is dumb, exactly dumb about his explanation? It's that he obediently contrasts what he thinks with metaphysical naturalism, that's what. He doesn't contrast what he thinks with the unautocratic Jesus who arose seriously, or the Jewish or Muslim denials. Scientologists strip the reincarnation as do spiritualists, deists, and system theologians. But no, he thinks accord the reincarnation doesn't hide presume equally he thinks science is based on presume. Such accomplish chatter this is. If it's not a precise of presume then why do scientists hesitate so far-flung and religionists disagreement about a spread-out suppose of issues? A fact is a fact you see. If it's not a fact, then it has to be accepted by an instinctive spring at over the probabilities, that is, by presume. Sheesh.