Sunday, June 3, 2012

Armand Mauss On The Angel And The Beehive Implications Of Mormon Assimilation And Retrenchment

Because of my assess in Mormon studies Dr. Armand Mauss has proved to be a very obliging stream for me. For thirty energy he has served as a tutor of sociology and pastoral studies at Washington Forward University in Pullman, WA. The cap deficient of his work was draw to a close acutely to nothing out of the ordinary sociology, but the rest of it to specializing in the sociology of religion, painstakingly Mormons, but with some care overly (in verification with his graduate students) to other pastoral exercises, by a community of so-called "Jesus Freaks" in the 1970s and to the Wine producer Christian Fellowship in the 1980s. For four energy he was editor of the "Recount for the Algebraic Watch of Religion" (the chief professional journal in the social-scientific study of religion).

When retirement to southern California in 1999 he has continued his quick-witted events, most very soon as Visiting Mystic in the String of Religion at the Claremont Graduate University, wherever he skilled a course in Mormon Studies taking into consideration each appointment modish 2005, 2006, and 2007. He is playwright or co-author of four books, most of them on Mormons, and some hundred articles in quick-witted journals. One of his most charming volumes for me is "The Guardian angel and the Beehive: The Mormon Involvedness with Assimilation" (University of Illinois Kneading, 1994).

MOREHEAD'S MUSINGS: Dr. Mauss, thank you so a long way away for coexisting to this ballot. I hang on hunger benefitted from your donation in my assess in Mormon studies, and a few energy ago you provided obliging rejoinder to a hearsay story I wrote for "Christian Probe Recount" on the Elizabeth Shear kidnapping battle. Your work was overly obliging in my graduate studies in Mormon culture at Salt Bring together Theological University. As we begin our homily, how did you become energetic in the quick-witted study of sociology, and did you repair the have a disagreement of this with your conviction as a Latter-day Saint?

ARMAND MAUSS: I began my studies with an displease in history - sincerely cultural history - and I customary moreover a B. A. and an M. A. degree in that grassland. For reasons that are not painstakingly applicable happening, I switched to sociology for my doctoral studies at the University of Californa, Berkeley. I was considerably that three luminaries in the sociology/anthropology of religion were on the brawn at Berkeley in folks days (1950s-60s) : Charles Glock, Robert Bellah, and Guy Swanson. My chief tutor was Glock. He had very soon come to Berkeley from Columbia and was taxing to revolutionize a assess encode in the sociology of religion. One of his cap projects was a study of Christian beliefs and anti-Semitism, financed by the Jewish Anti-Defamation Association and based upon a wonderful explore of Catholics and Protestants in northern California. I hunted him out and he prearranged to tie me on as one of his doctoral students. He knew nothing about Mormons (and did not quality any Mormons in his surveys), but he was intrigued by my handhold that Mormons were different in part the anti-Semitism so undivided in Christianity generally. Because of this extremely lift, unmoving, the LDS Cathedral was becoming eminent for its unfair convention in denying the priesthood to type of black African fall. All of this raised the overweight subject (of impressive displease to moreover Glock and me) of whether and how the pastoral beliefs of a type got translated in the field of racial or ancestral extremism opposed to other peoples. My enduring commitments to the LDS Cathedral, and to the far-seeing religion on which it was based, were hence continually under control as I contrasted sociological explanations and affidavit with traditional pastoral claims and doctrines. In the funds, I was be next to to tell on continually amongst the whatsoever and the divine elements in my pastoral origin. I had to learn to "bestow myself honorable," as it were, to try to make that diversity, considering it is not encouraged in one's nature as a Mormon. Ultimately, although, such glory as I hang on had in living moreover as a member and as a scholar in the sociable sciences has depended on my supervision in mind that diversity.

MOREHEAD'S MUSINGS: I absolutely very soon became familiar of an enlightening ballot you gave to Get older and Seasons in 2004 that intrigued me enormously. One of the questions you were asked I'd lack to follow happening. In my work in Utah I ghost be arranging for quick-witted conferences on new pastoral exercises, and Mormon studies ghost be an major expression of this, maybe the objective of the cap such hearsay. Probably your intelligence has untouched merely from the 2004 ballot, but what areas of assess would you lack to see pursued by academics in Mormon studies?

ARMAND MAUSS: Advantageously, I manifest the five topics (a complete e) that I mentioned in that T a renewed objective on the regulate of the church as a seer (with accompaniments to the D the centralization and equivalence of the church encode and supervision common as "correlation;" a impressive extra time in such "abnormal" Mormon programs as genealogy, temple-building, messenger work, and pastoral teaching (institution and begin programs) - all of which had languished for decades; and last of all a transformation and redefinition of the LDS theology of the ethnic, with a in a row definition of women's roles and an usual encode to make confident the nuclear ethnic launch as a ramparts opposed to the creeping vices of sexual indulgence, things use or abuse, and everyday other sociable ills afflicting American business considering the 1960s.

MOREHEAD'S MUSINGS: You hang on described this as an usual funds of refer to formation and branch intercession and renegotiation. This is not absolutely an usual but overly urbane sociable, cultural, and pastoral funds. Afterward evangelicals or traditional Christians countenance at such issues it is systematically a corner of distress directed absolutely on the way to doctrinal or worldview issues. Wouldn't your assess and piece involve that a a long way away broader template needs to be precise in order to understand these dynamics?

ARMAND MAUSS: Yes, to be in the bag. Notably that the LDS Cathedral advocates for the behavior and "life-style" of its members is about branch continuation, which is very major for any type or community seeking to chaos a good contour. For Mormons, living in a natural way is stuck-up major than believing in a natural way. We can imagine a long way away stuck-up about what or who a characteristic is from what he does than from what he believes (or claims to character). Moreover, beliefs can perfectly be untouched by teaching and by the promptings of the Sanctified Liveliness (either in this world or in the after that world, according to Mormonism). Reliable kinds of behavior, unmoving (such as sexual sin) can hang on cost in this life that can never be completely mitigated by similar to remorse. Ideally, type ghost learn moreover obedience belief and obedience behavior from involvement in the LDS community, but it is the behavioral grounds that really define the Mormon contour. I don't know if that's effusive what your subject was success at, but that's what cap came to mind.

MOREHEAD'S MUSINGS: Particular, painstakingly Protestant critics of the LDS Cathedral, systematically make the request that the Cathedral contradicts itself subsequent to it speaks with an integration power to the scab world, painstakingly to Protestants, and with the right to be heard of abbreviation within. In your Get older as a sociable scientist, my chief displease in theology is pleasing a long way away explicit to its implications for behavior. I determine that's why I find it serious to understand why the "fragment" has to be so "general" amongst Mormons and Evangelicals.

MOREHEAD'S MUSINGS: Relative to this subject and the issues of integration and retrentchment, as well as the eccentric of Mormon spirituality that includes sacred and modestly devoted aspects to it, attracts a lot of Protestant Christian aggravation. This has spilled over in the field of presidential politics with the theme of "at a low level obscurity" that was the fork of a novel "New York Get older" report. Can you charge how these issues are significant to such issues, and how non-Mormons may perhaps come sideways with less sensationalistic interpretations?

ARMAND MAUSS: I read that report by Noah Feldman in the NYT Stash, and I thought it was profit. He did a "fair and neutral" be bothered of what it is that puts type off about Mormonism, and why it is that Mormons are so surprised at the way they and their religion are professed. I haven't seen the new book (apparently average published) about Romney and Mormonism on the heels of this Feldman report, but it seems from the natural world lack average extra anti-Mormon barrage by a Mormon traitor. Sociologists who hang on awkward NRMs and their critics hang on hunger considering realized that apostates are between the smallest amount assured sources of information and understanding about a religion, considering they perfectly create in an expos'e mode to see-through their own amusement of morale. (The so-called "white steeplechaser image," for token, has hunger been common by scholars, Mormon and non-Mormon, to be a hole).

It is major to learn this Mormon passage within the family member and history context of other unpleasant religions (and Brickwork). The charge about Romney's promise to prevent the Mormon leaders, for token, is not absolutely false, but it is suitably reminiscent of the anti-Semitic "Protocols of the Elders of Zion," according to which communicate was a Jewish method to tie over the world. I hang on participated in the Mormon temple rituals everyday era, and I hang on through the extremely promise of observance that presumably Romney has through. Nevertheless, it is a promise of observance to GOD, NOT to any seer or of time leaders. The whole canard about what Certain goes on in Mormon temples reminds me of the consequential stories I hand-me-down to find out still developing up (not in Utah) about what Certain goes on in folks devoted Catholic convents and monasteries.

MOREHEAD'S MUSINGS: Dr. Mauss, thank you again for your care for. The information you hang on public and your quick-witted work ghost widen to make an major result in the understanding of Mormonism.

ARMAND MAUSS: Trust for sympathetic abundance about my lessons to ask for them.